One Cuckoo Short of a Nest Quick Links

News PoliticsReviews IT On A Friday Cabinet Unpacked

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Google’s Stand for Free Speech

Digg this

googlechinahomepage_thumb8 The Implications of Google’s Actions in China on the Labor Government’s proposed internet Censorship.


In a firm stand against the Chinese government’s human rights policies, Google yesterday announced that they will no longer provide the same search censoring service to China that they once did.

Google’s webmail service, Gmail, and several other internet services were subject to cyber attacks last month which Google have traced to China.

In a post on The Official Google Blog entitledA new approach to China”, Google’s Chief Legal Officer David Drummond stated that “we [Google] have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on”.

Drummond continues to explain that Google will “discuss [how Google could run] an unfiltered search engine within the [Chinese] law, if at all.” This is backed up by a statement that Google “may well [have] to shut down, and potentially [its] offices in China” if an agreement with the Government cannot be reached.

Drummond’s post indicates that the attacks were on the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists, and that Google have a strong belief in human rights and freedom of information. He comments that when Google China was launched in 2006 it was intended to make uncensored information more easily available in China, and that Google had experienced “discomfort” in agreeing to censorship.

Communications Minister Senator Stephen Conroy announced in December of last year that he plans to put legislation which would censor Australia’s internet to parliament before next election.

The Australian system will be implemented as a blacklist targeting “refused classification” (RC) websites. RC websites contain material which is not allowed a rating in Australia due to illegal actions being portrayed. A report leaked last March however suggests that some websites possibly outside of the initial scope of RC content may also be blocked, including some pages on the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia.

What are the implications of this on Google’s service in Australia? If the search engine were to leave Australia it may cause greater public unrest than in China where Google is not such a dominant search engine.

Google’s stance on freedom of information may lead to some disputes on service with the Australian Government, however the ISP-level filtering forwarded by Senator Conroy may mean that filtered content found on Google will lead to a dead link and not the blocked website.

Google’s actions in China show how a large information carrier such as Google can attempt to hold an entire country’s Government at ransom.


2 responses:

a political opinion said...

Nice article.
It is interesting how Google's search engine involvement in China appears to have dwindled to nothing, and it now just re-routs to the Hong Kong search engine. With Google expanding into mobile platforms (with android) and internet browsers like Chrome, I wonder how their disagreement with the Chinese government is 'assisting' them with their advances into the Chinese technology and software market?

William PJ Kulich said...

Thank you!
Technology in China is interesting as the degree of industrial espionage makes many different products available to the expanding middle class at a reasonable price.
I remember reports on this showing that Google really is a small player in China, I'm not sure if Google will have made too great an impact.

Post a Comment

Insulting, abusive or obscene content will be removed. Replies from non-members will be approved before being displayed.

Most Popular This Week on OCSN

Save the net from censorship!